Groundwater governance: where science, economics and politics meet

POSTER Researching a subject on the internet the slogan "Water flows upstream to money" popped up. The context was drought, and the meaning clear. If politics come into play as well, it would seem that science is relegated to a distant third place. The proclamation of the National Water Act, of 1998 (Act 36 of 1998), recognized the importance of groundwater and its role in the hydrological cycle and water supply issues. Groundwater governance has grown since then and is becoming increasingly important. One of the most important tenets on which groundwater based is the concept of sustainability. Various definitions of sustainability is used with the best know being "?development which meets the needs and aspirations of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." Even though the basic understanding of sustainability may have been around for much longer than the term, it is the application of the theory in our current context that present us with challenges. Concepts like the precautionary principle, corporate governance and other buzz words that is being used does not always ensure good groundwater governance. One of the greatest problems is often the lack of scientific understanding and knowledge. Groundwater systems tend to be more complex and thus more difficult to manage than surface water. Understanding how groundwater and surface water interact, and that it is actually a linked water resource adds to the complexity. Add to this its importance in the functioning of groundwater dependent ecosystems that is still poorly understood. This article will look at principles for good groundwater governance and the tools that are needed to achieve it. It will finally look at real case studies where scientific considerations fall by the wayside for the requirements of the economy and political goals.