Where AMD meets Karst, and Humans theorise (speculate?) whilst Nature acts

The karst aquifer downstream of the actively decanting West Rand Gold Field (a.k.a. the Western Basin) has for decades been receiving mine water discharge. Evidence of a mine water impact in the Bloubank Spruit catchment can be traced back to the early-1980s, and is attributed to the pumping out of so-called "fissure water" encountered during active underground mining operations for discharge on surface. Rewatering of the mine void following the cessation of subsurface mining activities in the late-1990s resulted in mine water decant in 2002. The last five hydrological years (2009?'10 to 2013?'14) have experienced the greatest volume and worst quality of mine water discharge in the 45-year flow and quality monitoring record (since 1979?'80) of the Bloubank Spruit system, causing widespread alarm and concern for the receiving karst environment. The focus of this attention is the Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site, with earlier speculation fuelled by an initial dearth of information and poor understanding of the dynamics that inform the interaction of surface and subsurface waters in this hydrosystem.

Oblivious to these circumstances, the natural hydrosystem provides an invaluable beneficial function in mitigating adverse impacts on the water resources environment at no cost to society. The hydrologic and hydrogeologic framework that informs this natural benefaction is described in quantitative physical and chemical terms that define the interaction of allogenic and autogenic water sources in a subregional context before highlighting the regional benefit. The subregional context is represented by the Bloubank Spruit catchment, a western tributary of the Crocodile River, which receives both mine water and municipal wastewater effluent and therefore bears the brunt of poor quality allogenic water inputs. The regional context is represented by the Hartbeespoort Dam catchment, which includes major drainages such as the Crocodile River to the south and its eastern tributaries the Jukskei and Hennops rivers, and the Magalies River and its southern tributary the Skeerpoort River to the west. Each of these drainages contribute to the quantity and quality of water impounded in the dam, and an analysis of their respective contributions therefore provides an informative measure of the temporal mine water impact in a regional context.

The result indicates that amongst other metrics, the total dissolved solids (TDS) load delivered by the Bloubank Spruit system in the last five hydrological years amounted to 11% of the total TDS load delivered to Hartbeespoort Dam in this period, ranking third behind the Jukskei River (49%) and the Hennops River (30%), and followed by the Magalies River (5%), Crocodile River (4%) and Skeerpoort River (1%). By comparison, the long-term record reflects changes only in the contributions of the impacted Bloubank Spruit (10%) and pristine Skeerpoort River (2%). The difference is attributed mainly to the intervention of Mother Nature.

Presenter Name
Phil
Presenter Surname
Hobbs
Area
Gauteng
Conference year
2015
Keywords