Making the Invisible Visible: Do Aquifers Have Agency?

In the social sciences, there has been a ‘posthuman’ turn, which seeks to emphasise the role of non-human agents as co-determining social behaviours. In adopting a ‘more-than-human’ approach, the academy seeks to avoid claims of human exceptionalism and extend the social to other entities. In this paper, we explore the extent to which the more-than-human approach might be applied to groundwater and aquifers and the implications that this may have for groundwater science. The role of groundwater in complex adaptive socio-ecological systems at different scales is increasingly well-documented. Access to groundwater resources positively influences societal welfare and economic development opportunities, particularly in areas where surface waters are scarce. The potential adverse effects of human activities on the quantity or quality of groundwaters are also widely reported. Adopting a ‘properties’ approach, traditional social science perspectives typically describe aquifers as structuring the agency of human actors. To what extent might aquifers also have agency, exhibited in their capacity to act and exert power? Drawing on insights from 5 cities across sub-Saharan Africa, we argue for the agency of aquifers in light of their capacity to evoke change and response in human societies. In doing so, we draw on the concept of the more-than-human to argue for a more conscious consideration of the interaction between the human and non-human water worlds whilst acknowledging the critical role played by researchers in shaping these interactions.