This paper outlines and presents out-of-the-box theories as examples to highlight some of the challenging restraints within the current legislative environment preventing scientists, engineers and other operational personnel to take theory into action and implementation. Key to this is the very static nature of the water use license (WUL)and associated process. The first example shows how integrated dynamic water modelling can be utilized to create an integrated water and waste management plan within the mining sector.

Groundwater numerical models are commonly used to determine the impact that groundwater abstraction has on the ability of surrounding areas to supply water, and thus to inform Water Use Licence (WUL) Applications. However, data available is often limited to that generated by relatively short-term geohydrological studies and pumping tests. In most cases this data and the degree of defined uncertainty in the model results are sufficient.

When conducting water quality monitoring, questions arise on which water quality guidelines to use and where to apply them. For example, the use of South African Water Quality Guidelines (SAWQG) for Domestic usage compared to the use of the South African National Standards (SANS) for Potable Water Quality when monitoring drinking water quality. The World Heath Organization (WHO) published a set of water quality guidelines for drinking water which can also be used instead of SANS.